Re: [Nasm-devel] Register overhaul

[debs <de...@dw...>]

At 17:51 30/05/2002 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

OK, I took a better look at it, and the following patch needs to be applied 
to regs.dat:

--- regs.dat.old        Fri May 31 23:02:44 2002
+++ regs.dat    Sat Jun  1 00:15:16 2002
@@ -8,19 +8,19 @@

  # General-purpose registers
  al     REG_AL          reg8    0
-ah     REG8            reg8    1
+ah     REG8            reg8    4
  ax     REG_AX          reg16   0
  eax    REG_EAX         reg32   0
-bl     REG8            reg8    6
+bl     REG8            reg8    3
  bh     REG8            reg8    7
  bx     REG16           reg16   3
  ebx    REG32           reg32   3
-cl     REG_CL          reg8    2
-ch     REG8            reg8    3
+cl     REG_CL          reg8    1
+ch     REG8            reg8    5
  cx     REG_CX          reg16   1
  ecx    REG_ECX         reg32   1
-dl     REG8            reg8    4
-dh     REG8            reg8    5
+dl     REG8            reg8    2
+dh     REG8            reg8    6
  dx     REG_DX          reg16   2
  edx    REG32           reg32   2
  sp     REG16           reg16   4

With this patch, it generates the correct code, but the output for ndisasm 
is still wrong in a few places. I'm still looking over it to see if I can 
work out what the problem is...


Debbie Wiles
de...@dw...

If you try and don't succeed, cheat. Repeat until caught. Then lie.

I report spam, any unsolicited emails on unrelated topics will be reported.