From: Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...> - 2011-07-20 20:58:50
|
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:50:03PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 07/20/2011 12:19 PM, anonymous coward wrote: > >>>> You can verify that the new insns.dat and insns.pl produce > >>>> byte-identical output to the old insns.dat and insns.pl [...] > >>> if the output is identical, I don't see any reason *not* to merge it > >> I merged the patch. > > > > The commit only shows insns.dat and insns.pl but no > > testcases -- did that old-vs-new testing happen at all? > > > > Would sync'ing a tree to before and after this change, > > and then diff'ing the 5 generated insns?.? files suffice? > > > > Yes, that would suffice. It would be sufficient (but not necessary) to > prove that nothing changed. > > -hpa > I somehow missed this thread ;) Just to clarify -- before commit the change I did compare insns*.c files generated before and after the commit to check that instructions remains the same, and they do, so it's 1:1 mapping. Cyrill |