Re: [NAntC-Dev] RE: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

[Ian M. <ianm@ActiveState.com>]

Tomas,
Maybe my phrasing was a bit off. Obviously they are useful for someone. 
I have no problem calling it

Nant.Experimental. Optional just came from the equivalent in Ant. 

Ian

> 
>Hi Ian,
>
><<
>I'm not so sure. I see NAnt.optional as a place for new tasks that may or
>may not be useful.
>  
>
>I guess this is what I don't like. Useful? Uhh... If someone wrote the damn
>thing, I'm sure *they* considered it useful. Who are we to decide what is
>"useful" and what not? But, if you guys decide we should be so bold as to
>take on that decision, then it becomes much easier: don't accept things that
>are *not useful* in the first place, and now you don't need NAnt.Optional
>again.
>If you were to say Nant.Experimental, well, that would convey a completely
>different meaning .... jejejeje
>
>--
>Tomas Restrepo
>to...@mv...
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
>Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
>Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
>http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
>_______________________________________________
>NAntContrib-Developer mailing list
>NAn...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
>  
>