Re: [nail-devel] Should i stop using nail-devel@ for S-nail messages? (Was: Re: Announcing S-nail v14.4.3)

[Stephen I. <n64...@sn...>]

My feeling, for what it's worth, is that unless someone actually starts 
maintaining Heirloom mailx, you might as well continue to use this list. 
If there were also correspondence about mailx on the list, then it would 
be helpful to separate out the S-nail messages, but, sadly, there is 
not.

Stephen Isard

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdaoden-at-gmail.com |nail-devel2| wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> it seems people start unsubscribing from nail-devel@ because
> they got pissed by non-Heirloom mailx(1) messages.
> So this is definitely not what i want, not at last because one of
> the unsubscribers is a person whose work i build upon personally.
>
> I sofar had the opinion that it is not worth the effort to start
> a new mailing list, but that nail-devel@ would suffice.
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be possible to "simply continue"
> nail, so that S-nail is indeed a fork, not a continuation.
>
> Thus i'm asking the remaining subscribers of nail-devel@ to
> decide.  Should you vote for that, i'll refrain from any future
> message here except announcing the major versions, as suggested.
> Thank you.
>
> --steffen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> nail-devel mailing list
> nai...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nail-devel
>
>