Re: [nail-devel] New features on [next] -- no more progress for quite a while

[Stephen I. <n64...@sn...>]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdaoden-at-gmail.com wrote:

> "Stephen Isard" <n64...@sn...> wrote:
> |On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdaoden-at-gmail.com wrote:
> |>. The old nail(1) legacy account support has been dropped.
> |>They were no longer documented since 2004-09-05 ([e56fa0ab]).
> |
> |Do you mean you are dropping the 'account' command and 's-nail -A'?
>
> I didn't know that `account' had a different syntax in ancient
> times before, too – it was a surprising discovery that we still
> supported an ancient syntax!

I'm confused now.  I only know about one 'account' command, whose man 
page entry includes the example

account myisp {
      set folder=imaps://my...@im...isp.example
      set record=+Sent
      set from="myname@myisp.example (My Name)"
      set smtp=smtp.myisp.example
}

If it had a bug, I'm glad you've fixed it, but it hasn't interfered with 
my use of the command as far as I know.  Anyway, are we still going to 
have that command and the accompanying -A command line flag?

> (P.S.: i hope it's ok i Cc:d the list.)

Apologies, I meant to write to the list in the first place.

Stephen Isard