From: Jose L. M. <jlm...@ca...> - 2009-08-26 11:10:34
|
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra escribió: > I fully agree with you, but could you please call it a name that > wouldn't cause confusion? Any proposals? > If you insist on using NSCA2, please implement a compatibility layer :) What type of compatibility would people want? Protocol compatibility? (that is that you can mix nsca2 and nsca clients and servers) - this one I'm not aiming for. Configuration compatibility? - Didn't have it in mind. Maybe if the community wants it, the community gets it :) Interface compatibility? (you subsitute clients and server, and everything keeps on working, that is: nagios doesn't have to be reconfigured to update to nsca2) - I'm aiming for type of compatibility Anything I didn't think of? Cheers, Jose Luis Martinez jlm...@ca... |