From: David S. <dsc...@do...> - 2006-10-30 20:04:26
|
Hi Andreas =09 A new backtrace follows. This doesn't show the same segmentation= issues as the first and to my untrained eye, doesn't show a problem.= However, this stack causes the same "hung" state in cmd.cgi. Any= ideas? (gdb) bt #0 0x002de7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0x003b4eb3 in __open_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x0035854d in _IO_new_file_fopen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #3 0x0034f0c9 in __fopen_internal () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #4 0x0034f11d in fopen@@GLIBC_2.1 () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #5 0x0804b6e0 in write_command_to_file ( cmd=3D0xbfeb4d00 "[1162238036] SCHEDULE_AND_PROPAGATE_HOST_DOWNTIME;w= ww.state.nv.us;1162237988;1162238108;1;0;7200;David Schlecht;test\n")= at cmd.c:2183 #6 0x0804b843 in commit_command (cmd=3D55) at cmd.c:2155 #7 0x0804ce69 in commit_command_data (cmd=3D55) at cmd.c:1798 #8 0x0804d358 in main () at cmd.c:215 (gdb) - David Schlecht (dschl) ----------------------- This thread is located in the archive at this URL: http://www.nagiosexchange.org/nagios-users.34.0.html?&tx_maillisttofaq_pi= 1[showUid]=3D22783 =09 |