Re: [MO-java-dev] compilation problem for mockobjects

[Jeff M. <je...@cu...>]

I really don't see what the problem is. We've only had like 5 mails from
gump in the last year it's not like we're inundated.

Personally I think it's good for it to be as visible as possible,
especially as our usual response seems to be not to fix the problem but
demand that we stop getting mails.

<joke>
Man goes into a doctors and says "My arm hurts when I do this." the
doctor replies "Don't do it then!"
</joke>


On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 15:48, Nat Pryce wrote:
> Oops, I forgot to add my intended point to the last email.  That is,
> perhaps gump output should be sent to a different list, mockobjects-gump
> for example.  What do people think?
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Nat.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
-- 
Jeff Martin
 
Memetic Engineer
 
http://www.custommonkey.org/