RE: [MO-java-dev] Building the core library problem + version number issue

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

Hi Steve,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Steve Freeman
> Sent: 03 November 2002 11:39
> To: 'MockObjects'
> Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] Building the core library problem + version
> number issue
> 
> I can't reproduce that. The src archive might be out of date, so I'll
put
> another one up.

I'm actually talking about building from CVS. Try it: make a clean
checkout somewhere and run "ant", you should get the same error.

> 
> You should at least copy junit.jar in the lib directory.

The junit jar has to be in Anthome/lib otherwise the ant <junit> task
won't work. Thus junit is already in the classpath. Anyway the error
seems to be with some mockobject class.

> 
> From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...>
> > I'm trying to build the mockobject core library by executing "ant
jar"
> > and it fails with the following kind of errors:
> >
> > compile-core:
> >     [mkdir] Created dir:
> > E:\Dev\mockobjects\mockobjects-java\out\core\classes
> >     [javac] Compiling 62 source files to
> > E:\Dev\mockobjects\mockobjects-java\out\core\classes
> >
> > compile-jdk:
> >     [mkdir] Created dir:
> > E:\Dev\mockobjects\mockobjects-java\out\jdk\classes
> >     [javac] Compiling 38 source files to
> > E:\Dev\mockobjects\mockobjects-java\out\jdk\classes
> >     [javac]
> >
E:\Dev\mockobjects\mockobjects-java\src\jdk\common\com\mockobjects\sql\C
> > ommonMockResultS
> > etMetaData.java:86: addActual(java.lang.Object) in
> > com.mockobjects.AbstractExpectationCollection can
> > not be applied to (int)
> >     [javac]         myColumnNameIndexes.addActual(aColumnIndex);
> >
> > What am I missing? Note: I haven't put any jar in the lib/ directory
but
> > the error doesn't seem to be about any missing jar.
> 
> 
> Well, I thought it would make the numbers line up better. I've just
> changed
> the formatting, not the value.

I can tell you it looks very strange when on SF you look at the
downloadable versions and see 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 and 0.07, because
mathematically 0.07 < 0.6 (I do understand the point about 0.07 not
being a number but nevertheless it will cause confusion - it already
has! :-)).

Thanks
-Vincent