RE: [MO-java-dev] SQL validation

[Greg M. <gre...@ya...>]

Why don't I finish the prototype & pass it along to
you guys.  Then you can decide if it's worth inclusion
in the project, and if so, in what capactiy.

--- moc...@li...
wrote:
> As we are all about testing - I would like to see
> someone put some work into
> testing SQL this way - it sounds cool. As you
> pointed out steve - there is
> an art to testing just the right amount so it would
> be interesting to see
> how this works out - but in theory why not work on
> it here and see how it
> pans out?
> 
> Tim
> 
> > the other thought that strikes me is that we know
> that test-first
> > changes the way we write our code (to make it
> testable). I would
> > expect that writing db access for testability
> would change the
> > way we write SQL. Has anyone noticed this?
> >
> > > I've created a prototype of such a feature,
> using a
> > > parser generated with JavaCC and a contributed
> grammar
> > > (http://www.cobase.cs.ucla.edu/pub/javacc/).  It
> seems
> > > to work OK.  (The grammar is a little
> Oracle-specific,
> > > but should handle standard SQL just fine.)
> > >
> > > Do you think this kind of feature would fit well
> in
> > > the mock objects core?  Or does it seem more
> like an
> > > optional feature which should be
> released/maintained
> > > separately?
> >
> > It sounds like a separate feature to me. Do people
> think it
> > should be hosted on the Mock Objects project?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
>
2‡$¡¸ÞrÛ#jözùšŠX§‚X¬´Ê’†ãyËl«ÚuëåŠËl²‹«qç讧zØm¶›?þX¬¶Ë(º·~Šà
> > zw­þX¬¶ÏåŠËbú?š‡$¡¸ÞrÛ#jö
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com