From: Michael S. <mi...@st...> - 2013-03-21 05:00:03
|
I suppose you are right if you don't read the documentation from the local web interface. I use the documentation all the time. From: Jim Serack [mailto:ji...@se...] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:25 PM To: 'Kevin Robert Keegan'; jr...@pr... Cc: 'Misterhouse-Users' Subject: Re: [mh] Google Analytics and hitslog.com Tracking in docs/toc.html It would seem to me that toc. html is only called when one triggers the "Misterhouse Website" button off the "MisterHouse Home" of the ia5 browser screen. Perhaps others can comment but I think that means that "Tracking" of our use of MisterHouse only occurs when we try to access the local cache of the "MisterHouse Website" and not for all the routine use of the web interface. I've grepped the code, bin, and web directories looking for calls to toc.html and didn't find any. If someone can confirm I think we can back off being alarmed at the tracking - it's only under a deliberate action. That's not to say that it shouldn't be removed if it is not providing any value but it's not an urgent issue in my opinion. Others? From: Kevin Robert Keegan [mailto:ke...@kr...] Sent: March-20-13 5:19 PM To: jr...@pr... Cc: Misterhouse-Users Subject: Re: [mh] Google Analytics and hitslog.com Tracking in docs/toc.html There are two entries in docs/toc.html around line 30 or so. It is HTML so you have to comment it out or just remove the stuff from <script> to </script>. If there are others, I haven't found them. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joel Davidson <jr...@pr...> wrote: Can someone who has disabled this code in mh give the rest of us a pointer as to where it is in the code? I'd like to disable it in the release I'm running at home until such time as I can pull a new, updated stable version from git. Thanks. Joel On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, it would appear that Lieven Hollevoet wrote: > Agreed. Opt-in is indeed safer and preferable. > > Lieven. > > Op 20-mrt.-2013, om 21:43 heeft Joel Davidson <jr...@pr...> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, it would appear that John wrote: >> >>> On 03/20/13 14:02, Kevin Robert Keegan wrote: >>>> >>>> I would be much happier if these things could only be enabled by an >>>> affirmative act on the user's part. >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. I recommend we remove this hard coded method and when someone >>> comes forward with an "opt in" implementation we can add that back in. >>> >>> John >> >> I concur. >> >> Joel >> -- >> Joel Davidson >> Austin, TX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar ________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list, go to: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=1365 |