From: Jim D. <ji...@du...> - 2012-10-30 00:43:30
|
On 10/29/2012 04:01 PM, Lieven Hollevoet wrote: >> >> No one really stops you or anyone else from importing mh into github and >> publishing your own changes. >> > > Hi all, > > I have a day off this week and I will try porting the current SVN code (at least trunk and insteon branch) to github. One question: we already found some enthusiasts to share the task of integrating pull requests. > > A second thing that we need to agree on: will we all use github? Will we force this for everybody? All current contributors are using SVN, I don't know if they are willing to change to git. Developers, please chime in. Well, I consider myself one of the developers. To be honest, and sadly, I haven't been following this discussion about moving Misterhouse to github. I've used both SVN and GIT. To me, they accomplish the same thing. I don't quite understand why SVN is "broken" for us? For what we do, it seems to me that SVN is working just fine. Is this just a matter of preference? Is there something wrong with sourceforge that is forcing is to move to github? If we are moving to github, then who is going to own control and ownership? How do I as a developer get access to pushing changes to github? Does this mean that we are going to have misterhouse sources on both sourceforge and github? That would be really bad. I would assume that if the group has to and must move to github, then we need to shut down SVN on sourceforge or the code is going to fragmented. I apologize for not paying attention or contibuting to this discussion. But, I don't understand what is broken. Regards, Jim |