Re: [mh] Possible regression in n-way setup handling in branch (was Re: Does insteon-svn allow for full link syncing now?)

[Eloy P. <pe...@ch...>]

Hi Gregg,

On 06/14/2011 04:43 PM, Gregg Liming wrote:

> On 6/14/2011 4:29 PM, Eloy Paris wrote:
>
>> There's still the (hopefully known by you) "issue" of state being
>> tracked as "on" and "100%"
>
> Are you referring to items that are either SwitchLincRelay or
> KepPadLincRelay?  If so, can you clarify a use case so that I can
> hopefully track down how it is getting set?
>
> If they are not of the *Relay item type, then forcing state consistency
> as you want isn't reasonable (since they're dimmable).

I see this on SwitchLincRelay objects. The use case involves the same 
3-way setup I've mentioned before: in the initial state all switches are 
in the "off" state. When I locally turn on slave switch #1, the new 
state for the three devices is as follows:

master: 100%
slave #1: on
slave #2: 100%

The original discussion we had on this in January is archived here:

http://old.nabble.com/'on'-versus-'100-'-and-'off'-versus-'0-'-td30789454.html

Cheers,

Eloy Paris.-