Re: [mh] xPL Item Usage Question

[Andy M. <myi...@st...>]

Gregg Liming wrote:
> Also, note that this is not useful
> for xPL apps that are really "gateways" for multiple "devices".
................
> Arguably, having such a capability might be useful so
> that xPL_Item to "sub addressable" devices can occur in the same way
> that xAP item correlation already exists.  If interest exists, I'll give
> this more thought.
>
>   
Greg,

Well, the time has come...... I would really appreciate having the
capability for "sub addressable" devices!

I have built a small switch controller for controlling my irrigation
system. Of course, now I would like to have MH control it via xPL (which
it already understands).

It uses the "control.basic" basic schema, so the messages are simple {
device=3, current=on }. Do you think it would take you long to add
support for individual device numbers?

I am willing to have a go. Let me know if you have time or would prefer
me to add the support.

Andy.