From: Rick D. <ri...@de...> - 2004-10-03 02:54:37
|
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 00:38 +1000, Chris Barrett wrote: > It would seem some what of a pity that, almost four years later, we simpl= y=20 > roll-over to yet another major version number without some sort of major-= ish=20 > change. (Don't take that the wrong way guys! Cumulatively there've been=20 > hundreds of changes but the incrementing of the major version number is=20 > usually as a result of some sort of major change or milestone) >=20 > Thoughts? Is there some sort of major work that needs doing that we can = try=20 > and sort out before we roll over to 3.00? One of the things I've been wishing that MH had was better separation between the function and the user interface. I used to run MH manually, and when I did I'd run the TK interface. Then I switched to running it as a service (I'm running on Linux), and the TK interface had to go. It would be nice if the core MH function could run, and the TK interface (or something like it) could be run separately and talk to the core function. Of course there might be a way to do this which I haven't discovered, in which case, refer to the other posts about documentation. |