From: André H. <ne...@da...> - 2014-05-28 17:24:07
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 27.05.2014 01:04, schrieb JonY: > On 5/27/2014 05:23, André Hentschel wrote: >>> I don't see any obvious problems with it. Just one question though, does >>> the ARM compiler also interpret -m32/-m64? >> >>> If so, there should be some checks added to prevent accidentally trying >>> to build x86 stuff with it. Of course, the check can come in later. >> >> Thx for the review, i pushed it after fixing some obvious bugs. >> The ARM gcc bails out on -m32/-m64... Do you mean a check like the existing one for libce? >> > > That too, I'm just wondering what will the ARM compiler do with > -m32/-m64 or if multilib is even possible given that ARM has recently > introduced 64bit CPUs. - -m32/-m64 even alerts with aarch64 aware compilers, the architectures are strictly separated. On aarch32 there are switches like -marm and -mthumb(2), but i really doubt that we should wait for -m32/-m64 on ARM. At the moment we also should focus on aarch32 and don't even care about aarch64 until we have a working toolchain. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJThhurAAoJEGm5GZTakYssAJUL/jrhSTAdOSOqDlyQQbqAxlxl zAcIMc5JqLJqvPfbCUSGMrJ6uH8gYHggLtk5KBAalym08vFnErAwwk5b6JQC+9Eu Xb5fj199CwdeVX/fMR2nkjyS6UruVvYoLHtEqXW+e7z21K9KHMNR1Sd1hxJaaMhk aN19rHLAOv10WBXayAHxFBhW8THy4Lyu9i2OlDVyAFDRX03Hu5htPj7ut9ST1J5D EmIp7oHKsE8UK+g6w2KX6RDxJGa0yIlagoHv6zIxABWxHe8eNEb9ztP7bROQ4JrG BAUDf368Qh5Ha8U5B4QBmmRKTxXeBwtLkZ/RV+7nh6y0mVKUqRoApPhLVIHLUzlY IeejaW6/d/u6A7icSzPsMHHT+44Q5fkFq6xd5IiDLaOy1KgEPNI3cauE0OcfjeIJ jXG2AIBTBh/wIHHBKKumbse/Zyr+Fj6tMqEDJTsKcZfRFW1vQZmeKHE54oTPI1/V ZIqWdlDU28AXN3KcHFdoMmr58fOYSUhAG0uQlku3qQ== =Vq0K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |