From: Алексей П. <al...@gm...> - 2013-01-14 09:39:49
|
Hey! Maybe fork new Cygwin to MSYS2 is the best solution? I am interesting in it because MSYS is very old and porting new software for it is very difficult. I can help you any way I can. I have Cygwin git repo on https://github.com/Alexpux/Cygwin.git ерфе I synchronizes once a week with Cygwin cvs repo. And I have diff between msys and cygwin-1.3.3. We can do if anybody interesting in it. 2013/1/14 Ruben Van Boxem <van...@gm...> > Hey guys, > > I couldn't sleep last night and thought of this: MSYS is a fork of Cygwin, > which introduced a bunch of POSIX runtime stuff to be able to run all them > shell commands. > > What if someone were to write an sh interpreter that used special tricks > to manipulate directory names when it calls programs, which were all > compiled for native Win32? The sh interpreter could act as a process/thread > manager that handles all the shell's forking. > > I know there would be some trickiness involved when running shell scripts > containing Unix-like directory names, although I don't think it would be > undoable. > > This might be exactly what MSYS does of course, but it requires a special > build environment and ancient GCC (although the mysterious MSYS2 will > probably fix this). > > Cheers, > > Ruben > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Min...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > > |