[MiKTeX] structured index

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 454-5900

This is good idea. It can be done even simpler
$A_{i\cdot}^{}{}_i^j$
It also works.
Aleks Kleyn
http://sites.google.com/site/AleksKleyn/ 
http://arxiv.org/a/kleyn_a_1  
http://AleksKleyn.blogspot.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Degtyarev [mailto:de...@fe...] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:15 AM
To: 'A place for MiKTeX users to discuss MiKTeX related questions.'
Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] structured index

I think I understand your problem: it is cause by the double indices; the
upper index changes the position of the lower one. I just tried this:
$A_{i\cdot}^{\phantom{j}}{}_i^j$
and it seems OK.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleks Kleyn [mailto:ale...@op...]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 3:55 AM
> To: 'A place for MiKTeX users to discuss MiKTeX related questions.'
> Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] structured index
> 
> I tried yesterday this option before send email. Even in case
> {}_iA_i{}_i
> all indexes are on the same level. As soon I change second i to
> {i\cdot} or
> {i.} or {i\,} level of third i changes. Is it a bug or special
> formatting is
> not clear.
> 
> Aleks Kleyn
> http://sites.google.com/site/AleksKleyn/
> http://arxiv.org/a/kleyn_a_1
> http://AleksKleyn.blogspot.com/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Degtyarev [mailto:de...@fe...]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:00 AM
> To: 'A place for MiKTeX users to discuss MiKTeX related questions.'
> Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] structured index
> 
> I would try to start with $ C{}_1{}^i_{kl}{}^{pq}_r $
> At the expense of slightly worse position of the first index, this
> should
> level them all.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aleks Kleyn [mailto:Aleks_Kleyn@MailAPS.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:08 AM
> > To: 'A place for MiKTeX users to discuss MiKTeX related questions.'
> > Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] structured index
> >
> > I will try to explain. Assume I use transformation f. then it has
> > coordinates f^i_j. however I may have so much these transformations
> > that I
> > need to enumerate f itself. If I write f^i_{kj} then it is not clear
> > the
> > function of k. does it enumerates f or this is index. So I clearly
> > separate
> > indexes that serves different functionality and each group is
> separated
> > by
> > symbol \cdot. If structure of all such indexes is the same I could
> use
> > macros to write as was suggested
> > f_{k\cdot j}^{\hphantom{k\cdot}i} (it works); but I have different
> > index
> > structures. It may be for instance
> > C_1{}^i_{kl}{}^{pq}_r
> > I use such indexes when I study tower of representations or
> components
> > of
> > Gateaux derivative. And when derivative is of high order in module I
> > need
> > clearly separate index that enumerates function from index that
> > enumerate
> > independent variable.
> >
> > Aleks Kleyn
> > http://sites.google.com/site/AleksKleyn/
> > http://arxiv.org/a/kleyn_a_1
> > http://AleksKleyn.blogspot.com/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike "Pomax" Kamermans [mailto:po...@ni...]
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:42 AM
> > To: A place for MiKTeX users to discuss MiKTeX related questions.
> > Subject: Re: [MiKTeX] structured index
> >
> > On 3/20/2011 10:29 AM, Aleks Kleyn wrote:
> > > I very often use in text the expression like
> > > \[
> > > A_{1\cdot}{}^i_k
> > > \]
> > > However I put attention that index k is positioned bellow than
> index
> > 1.
> > > There is impression like k is index for 1. How I can make sure that
> > index
> > k
> > > is positioned on the same lavel as 1.
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, with "k" on the same line, what does your
> > expression say? I don't know what you intend to write, but with "k"
> on
> > the baseline for "1", I see "1 (dot) k-with-i-over-it", with the "i"
> > belonging to "k", and nothing else. If that's what you intended to
> > write, then your TeX formula is wrong. It would be better to then
> write
> > your formula as three components that follow each other, possibly
> with
> > using relstack and phantom commands to ensure correct alignment. If,
> > however, you meant "1 (dot)" with a superscript "i" and subscript
> "k",
> > then "k" should not be on the baseline for "1" at all, because it's
> > only
> > a subscript if it's lower than the parent's baseline.
> >
> > There are various ways to force "1" and "k" to share the same
> baseline,
> > but what is the mathematical concept you're trying to write out?
> >
> > - Mike "Pomax" Kamermans
> > nihongoresources.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -----
> > --
> > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> > for your organization - today and in the future.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> > _______________________________________________
> > MiKTeX-Users mailing list
> > MiK...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -------
> > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to
> meet
> > the
> > growing manageability and security demands of your customers.
> > Businesses
> > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your
> > software
> > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability
> Checker
> > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
> > _______________________________________________
> > MiKTeX-Users mailing list
> > MiK...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> --
> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet
> the
> growing manageability and security demands of your customers.
> Businesses
> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your
> software
> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
> _______________________________________________
> MiKTeX-Users mailing list
> MiK...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet
> the
> growing manageability and security demands of your customers.
> Businesses
> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your
> software
> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
> _______________________________________________
> MiKTeX-Users mailing list
> MiK...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
MiKTeX-Users mailing list
MiK...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users

[MiKTeX] structured index

MiKTeX source code moved to GitHub

[MiKTeX] structured index