From: Brian P. <br...@vm...> - 2009-07-31 13:50:24
|
Michał Król wrote: > Brian Paul pisze: >> I think I'd prefer to rename the "simple" LOOP2/ENDLOOP2 instructions >> as LOOP/ENDLOOP and call the above functions LOOP_COUNT/ENDLOOP_COUNT. >> >> > > I am all for renaming, but just to make them shorter, what about the > following renaming? > > LOOP => FORLOOP > ENDLOOP => ENDFOR > > BGNLOOP2 => BGNLOOP > ENDLOOP2 => ENDLOOP > How about LOOP => BGNFOR to be symmetric with ENDFOR? -Brian |