You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(18) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(72) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(56) |
2004 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(39) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(22) |
2005 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(58) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(68) |
2006 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(82) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(279) |
Aug
(139) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(81) |
Dec
(78) |
2007 |
Jan
(141) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(72) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(61) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(101) |
2008 |
Jan
(100) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(76) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(77) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(75) |
2009 |
Jan
(103) |
Feb
(105) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(75) |
Nov
(181) |
Dec
(133) |
2010 |
Jan
(107) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(145) |
Apr
(89) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(111) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(83) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(16) |
2011 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(34) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(73) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(28) |
2012 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(71) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(61) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(137) |
2013 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(46) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(17) |
2014 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(72) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(81) |
Jul
(63) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(48) |
Dec
(109) |
2015 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(56) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(100) |
Oct
(57) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(46) |
2016 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(108) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(66) |
Dec
(47) |
2017 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(28) |
2018 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2019 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(9) |
2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(40) |
2021 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(105) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(41) |
2022 |
Jan
(139) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(104) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(81) |
2023 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(98) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(72) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(61) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(94) |
2024 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(66) |
Apr
(88) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(103) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-28 21:51:41
|
Bugs item #1162916, was opened at 2005-03-14 06:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1162916&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: zouyc (zouyc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bug about tex(x^0.1) Initial Comment: Example: (%i1) tex(x^0.1); $$x^0.1$$ (%o1) FALSE (%i2) tex(x^\{0\.1\}); $$x^{{0.1}}$$ (%o2) FALSE The result "$$x^0.1$$" is wrong. Though (%o2) is correct, how about the case when the index is a symbol, such as: (%i3) p:0.1$ tex(x^p); (%i4) $$x^0.1$$ (%o4) FALSE (%i5) tex(x^(p)); $$x^0.1$$ (%o5) FALSE The (%o5) --$$x^0.1$$ is incorrect either. ________________________ The maxima version: 5.9.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 2005-03-14 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28849 This has been fixed in CVS sources: (%i5) tex(x^0.1); $$x^{0.1}$$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1162916&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-28 17:44:24
|
Bugs item #1156759, was opened at 2005-03-04 11:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 6 Submitted By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range Initial Comment: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range for y (ordinary) or t (parametric). These examples work in 5.9.1 official release (cmucl), but fail with Unknown plot option in current cvs (2005/03/03). (%i3) plot2d(sec(x),[x,-2,2],[y,-20,20],[nticks,200]); Unknown plot option specified: y (%i4) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,80]]); Unknown plot option specified: t (%i5) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,8]]); Unknown plot option specified: t These examples work in current cvs: (%i2) plot2d(sin(x),[x,-5,5]); (%i6) plot2d([x^3+2,[parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-5,5], [nticks,80]]],[x,-3,3]); These examples are copied from the ? plot2d examples. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 2005-03-28 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28849 Yes, this is a case-sensitivity bug. I think the occurrences of |$x|, |$y|, and friends were overlooked. They should be just $x, $y, etc. The case for $t is a bit unclear to me, but I think $set_plot_options just needs to handle $t the same way it handles $x and $y. With this fix, all of the examples above work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2005-03-25 03:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 I suspect this is a case-sensitivity bug. If I remember correctly, the options work OK if x is specified in lowercase and Y is specified in uppercase; don't know about z or t. Sorry, I can't test it till about the 28th or so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Amundson (amundson) Date: 2005-03-24 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28457 I'm sure this is my fault. I must have introduced a bug when I made my last round of fixes in plot2d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-28 16:36:09
|
Bugs item #1156759, was opened at 2005-03-04 11:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range Initial Comment: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range for y (ordinary) or t (parametric). These examples work in 5.9.1 official release (cmucl), but fail with Unknown plot option in current cvs (2005/03/03). (%i3) plot2d(sec(x),[x,-2,2],[y,-20,20],[nticks,200]); Unknown plot option specified: y (%i4) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,80]]); Unknown plot option specified: t (%i5) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,8]]); Unknown plot option specified: t These examples work in current cvs: (%i2) plot2d(sin(x),[x,-5,5]); (%i6) plot2d([x^3+2,[parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-5,5], [nticks,80]]],[x,-3,3]); These examples are copied from the ? plot2d examples. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 2005-03-28 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28849 Yes, this is a case-sensitivity bug. I think the occurrences of |$x|, |$y|, and friends were overlooked. They should be just $x, $y, etc. The case for $t is a bit unclear to me, but I think $set_plot_options just needs to handle $t the same way it handles $x and $y. With this fix, all of the examples above work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2005-03-25 03:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 I suspect this is a case-sensitivity bug. If I remember correctly, the options work OK if x is specified in lowercase and Y is specified in uppercase; don't know about z or t. Sorry, I can't test it till about the 28th or so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Amundson (amundson) Date: 2005-03-24 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28457 I'm sure this is my fault. I must have introduced a bug when I made my last round of fixes in plot2d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-25 08:23:15
|
Bugs item #1156759, was opened at 2005-03-04 09:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by robert_dodier You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range Initial Comment: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range for y (ordinary) or t (parametric). These examples work in 5.9.1 official release (cmucl), but fail with Unknown plot option in current cvs (2005/03/03). (%i3) plot2d(sec(x),[x,-2,2],[y,-20,20],[nticks,200]); Unknown plot option specified: y (%i4) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,80]]); Unknown plot option specified: t (%i5) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,8]]); Unknown plot option specified: t These examples work in current cvs: (%i2) plot2d(sin(x),[x,-5,5]); (%i6) plot2d([x^3+2,[parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-5,5], [nticks,80]]],[x,-3,3]); These examples are copied from the ? plot2d examples. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2005-03-25 01:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 I suspect this is a case-sensitivity bug. If I remember correctly, the options work OK if x is specified in lowercase and Y is specified in uppercase; don't know about z or t. Sorry, I can't test it till about the 28th or so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Amundson (amundson) Date: 2005-03-24 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28457 I'm sure this is my fault. I must have introduced a bug when I made my last round of fixes in plot2d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-25 03:28:16
|
Bugs item #1156759, was opened at 2005-03-04 10:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amundson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core >Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) >Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range Initial Comment: plot2d complains about Unknown plot option if given a range for y (ordinary) or t (parametric). These examples work in 5.9.1 official release (cmucl), but fail with Unknown plot option in current cvs (2005/03/03). (%i3) plot2d(sec(x),[x,-2,2],[y,-20,20],[nticks,200]); Unknown plot option specified: y (%i4) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,80]]); Unknown plot option specified: t (%i5) plot2d([parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-%pi*2,%pi*2], [nticks,8]]); Unknown plot option specified: t These examples work in current cvs: (%i2) plot2d(sin(x),[x,-5,5]); (%i6) plot2d([x^3+2,[parametric,cos(t),sin(t),[t,-5,5], [nticks,80]]],[x,-3,3]); These examples are copied from the ? plot2d examples. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Amundson (amundson) Date: 2005-03-24 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28457 I'm sure this is my fault. I must have introduced a bug when I made my last round of fixes in plot2d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1156759&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-25 03:26:59
|
Bugs item #1116091, was opened at 2005-02-04 04:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amundson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1116091&group_id=4933 Category: Tests >Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: error in run_testsuite Initial Comment: Repeated run of run_testsuite() display errors like these Error summary: Error found in /usr/local/share/maxima/5.9.1/tests/rtest1.mac, problem: (10) Error found in /usr/local/share/maxima/5.9.1/tests/rtest15.mac, problem: (46) Error found in /usr/local/share/maxima/5.9.1/tests/rtest12.mac, problem: (20) However, the first run of run_testsuite ends with no error message! Maxima version: 5.9.1 Maxima build date: 18:21 1/12/2005 host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL 2.6.5 Dr. T.I. Toth Cardiff University Cardiff U.K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Amundson (amundson) Date: 2005-03-24 21:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28457 The main problem here is the broken behavior of kill, but there may be a few other minor problems. I'm working on it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2005-02-10 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 I've reproduced this behavior on my machine (Maxima 5.9.1cvs on clisp 2.31 on linux). It seems likely this is due to global variables being assigned by some tests which hang around after the test is over, and then change the way results are computed for other tests when run_testsuite() is executed again. This theory could be tested by doing a global save before run_testsuite(), then restoring, then doing run_testsuite() again. Unfortunately there's no built in mechanism for global save -- "save (filename, all)" isn't it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1116091&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 16:28:23
|
Bugs item #1169996, was opened at 2005-03-24 10:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169996&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Amundson (amundson) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: Prompt missing after example Initial Comment: From: Andrej Vodopivec <and...@fm...> To: Maxima List <ma...@ma...> Subject: [Maxima] Prompt missing after example Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:18:31 +0100 Hi, cvs version of maxima does not display prompts after example commands. Bellow, prompt %i2 is missing. ----------------------------------------------- (%i1) example(product); (%i2) product(i*(1+i)/2+x,i,1,4) (%o2) (x + 1) (x + 3) (x + 6) (x + 10) (%o2) done 1; (%o3) 1 (%i4) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.9.1.1cvs Maxima build date: 15:43 3/20/2005 host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL 2.6.5 ----------------------------------------------- Andrej ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169996&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 15:49:52
|
Bugs item #1169964, was opened at 2005-03-24 09:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169964&group_id=4933 Category: Documentation Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Amundson (amundson) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: no documentation for discrete plots Initial Comment: The discrete plot option I added has no documentation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169964&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 15:45:34
|
Bugs item #1169962, was opened at 2005-03-24 09:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169962&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Amundson (amundson) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: cmucl runtime not detected properly Initial Comment: configure is unable to determine the cmucl runtime when using the kde-redhat version of cmucl. The runtime detection code needs to be smarter overall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169962&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 15:43:42
|
Bugs item #1169961, was opened at 2005-03-24 09:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169961&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Amundson (amundson) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: configure should check for gcl -ansi Initial Comment: When gcl is selected at configure time, we should check that gcl has been compiled with the -ansi flag. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169961&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 15:32:14
|
Bugs item #1169951, was opened at 2005-03-24 09:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169951&group_id=4933 Category: Documentation Group: Fix for 5.9.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Amundson (amundson) Assigned to: James Amundson (amundson) Summary: init file location not clear in man page Initial Comment: It is not clear from the man page where the user maxima-init.(lisp,mac) files should go. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169951&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-24 04:08:11
|
Bugs item #1169382, was opened at 2005-03-23 14:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by willisbl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169382&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: for matrix A, A[1,0] give "[" Initial Comment: Example : (%i1) A:matrix([1,2],[3,4]); [1 2] (%o1) [ ] [ 3 4] (%i2) A[1,0]; (%o2) [ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Date: 2005-03-23 22:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895922 Matrices and lists are indexed starting at 1. If you want the element of A in the 2nd row first column, use A[2,1]. So why does A[1,0] evaluate to [ ? Because A[1,0] == part(A,1,0). The zeroth part of a non-atom is its operator. Now, part(A,1) is a list and part(A,1,0) is the operator of a list. Finally, the operator of a list is [. I don't consider A[1,0] --> [ to be a bug. Others may have different opinions. Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169382&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-23 20:22:45
|
Bugs item #1169382, was opened at 2005-03-23 12:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169382&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: for matrix A, A[1,0] give "[" Initial Comment: Example : (%i1) A:matrix([1,2],[3,4]); [1 2] (%o1) [ ] [ 3 4] (%i2) A[1,0]; (%o2) [ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1169382&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-23 09:43:25
|
Bugs item #1168962, was opened at 2005-03-23 01:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1168962&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: Fix for 5.9.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Batchmode Initial Comment: How Can I Run Maxima in background from shell! Like gnuplot runs from shell with $ gnuplot -persist {loadfile} Since some computations are time consuming, and interactive mode means a window is always open. I want to have it in batchmode so that computations are done in background with no maxima shell or xmaxima xwindow need to be opened for prolonged interval ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1168962&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-23 00:35:15
|
Bugs item #1167441, was opened at 2005-03-21 04:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by willisbl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 Category: Share Libraries Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate pbs.? Initial Comment: maxima chokes on integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); MuPAD, by comparison, gives an ans. in ca. 2 sec. maxima 5.9.1 bld: 21/24 9/23/04 host: i686 linux lisp Common, 19a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Date: 2005-03-22 18:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895922 Thanks for following up on this. I'll close the bug. Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2005-03-22 16:53 Message: Logged In: NO Barton is correct. My pb. was due to texmacs not passing the question forward. Perhaps this whole thread should be deleated here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Date: 2005-03-21 05:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895922 I didn't check these answers by hand, but I don't see a problem. Maybe you could send a copy of your session, or explain why these antiderivatives are wrong. (%i1) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?neg; (%o1) -log(x^2+a*x+1)/2-(a*atan((2*x+a)/sqrt(4-a^2)))/sqrt(4-a^2)+log(x) (%i2) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o2) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i3) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?pos; (%o3) -(a*log((2*x-sqrt(a^2-4)+a)/(2*x+sqrt(a^2-4)+a)))/(2*sqrt(a^2-4))-log(x^2+a*x+1)/2+log(x) (%i4) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o4) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i5) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.9.1 Maxima build date: 7:34 9/24/2004 host type: i686-pc-mingw32 lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL 2.6.5 Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-22 22:53:47
|
Bugs item #1167441, was opened at 2005-03-21 02:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 Category: Share Libraries Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate pbs.? Initial Comment: maxima chokes on integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); MuPAD, by comparison, gives an ans. in ca. 2 sec. maxima 5.9.1 bld: 21/24 9/23/04 host: i686 linux lisp Common, 19a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2005-03-22 14:53 Message: Logged In: NO Barton is correct. My pb. was due to texmacs not passing the question forward. Perhaps this whole thread should be deleated here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Date: 2005-03-21 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895922 I didn't check these answers by hand, but I don't see a problem. Maybe you could send a copy of your session, or explain why these antiderivatives are wrong. (%i1) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?neg; (%o1) -log(x^2+a*x+1)/2-(a*atan((2*x+a)/sqrt(4-a^2)))/sqrt(4-a^2)+log(x) (%i2) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o2) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i3) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?pos; (%o3) -(a*log((2*x-sqrt(a^2-4)+a)/(2*x+sqrt(a^2-4)+a)))/(2*sqrt(a^2-4))-log(x^2+a*x+1)/2+log(x) (%i4) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o4) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i5) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.9.1 Maxima build date: 7:34 9/24/2004 host type: i686-pc-mingw32 lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL 2.6.5 Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-22 05:04:14
|
Bugs item #1168099, was opened at 2005-03-21 23:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1168099&group_id=4933 Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff Yapp (starseeker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Need to detail the available "maximaized" lisp functions Initial Comment: There exist many functions in Maxima that are expressions of basic programming tools in lisp, but tweaked to conveniently handle Maxima level interactions. These should be identified and documented. Example mfboundp is a version of fboundp in lisp which works on maxima functions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1168099&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-21 11:05:34
|
Bugs item #1167441, was opened at 2005-03-21 04:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by willisbl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 Category: Share Libraries Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate pbs.? Initial Comment: maxima chokes on integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); MuPAD, by comparison, gives an ans. in ca. 2 sec. maxima 5.9.1 bld: 21/24 9/23/04 host: i686 linux lisp Common, 19a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Date: 2005-03-21 05:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895922 I didn't check these answers by hand, but I don't see a problem. Maybe you could send a copy of your session, or explain why these antiderivatives are wrong. (%i1) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?neg; (%o1) -log(x^2+a*x+1)/2-(a*atan((2*x+a)/sqrt(4-a^2)))/sqrt(4-a^2)+log(x) (%i2) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o2) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i3) integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); Is a^2-4positive or negative?pos; (%o3) -(a*log((2*x-sqrt(a^2-4)+a)/(2*x+sqrt(a^2-4)+a)))/(2*sqrt(a^2-4))-log(x^2+a*x+1)/2+log(x) (%i4) radcan(diff(%,x)); (%o4) 1/(x^3+a*x^2+x) (%i5) build_info(); Maxima version: 5.9.1 Maxima build date: 7:34 9/24/2004 host type: i686-pc-mingw32 lisp-implementation-type: Kyoto Common Lisp lisp-implementation-version: GCL 2.6.5 Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-21 10:49:26
|
Bugs item #1167441, was opened at 2005-03-21 02:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 Category: Share Libraries Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: integrate pbs.? Initial Comment: maxima chokes on integrate(1/(x**3+a*x**2+x),x); MuPAD, by comparison, gives an ans. in ca. 2 sec. maxima 5.9.1 bld: 21/24 9/23/04 host: i686 linux lisp Common, 19a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1167441&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-21 10:42:51
|
Bugs item #1086880, was opened at 2004-12-16 21:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1086880&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: for maxima-5.9.1-1 Initial Comment: after rpm on RedHat9.0 #maxima #/usr/bin/maxima: unable to determine MAXIMA_PREFIX I don't know why it doesn't work. Give me a hand,THX!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2005-03-21 02:42 Message: Logged In: NO This diagnostic appeared on at least one system because no maxima-exec-...rpm was installed. Can be seen as a bug in the maxima...rpm package, which fail if there is no exec. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2005-03-16 17:14 Message: Logged In: NO I have the same pb. with SuSE 8.1! Even after: export MAXIMA_PREFIX=/usr/share/maxima/5.9.1 and variations. Tricks welcome! kra...@fo... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2004-12-31 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 To the author of the original bug report, if you're still watching -- I'd like to help but I think more info is needed. I have a very similar system (RH Fedora) and I can run Maxima as installed from the maxima-5.9.1-1 and maxima-exec-cmucl-5.9.1-1 rpm's (downloaded from Sourceforge). So it looks like your environment is different. Maybe you can give some more details to help us get started. -- Robert Dodier (rob...@us...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-12-17 20:32 Message: Logged In: NO [root@localhost root]# rpm -Uvh maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: tk is needed by maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1086880&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-18 17:37:42
|
Bugs item #1165488, was opened at 2005-03-17 13:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165488&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: elliptic_kc and diff Initial Comment: The dérivative of elliptic_kc gives 2 times the exact value. To remedy 1. make a lisp file that contains (defprop %elliptic_kc ((m) ;; diff wrt m ((mtimes) ((rat) 1 2) ((mplus) ((%elliptic_ec) m) ((mtimes) -1 ((%elliptic_kc) m) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)))) ((mexpt) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)) -1) ((mexpt) m -1))) grad) (the same function as in .../maxima/5.9.1/src/ellipt.lisp modified by the "((rat) 1 2)" ) 2. load this file at the beginnig of a session. That's all. To see the error plot2d([(elliptic_kc(x+0.001)-elliptic_kc(x))/0.001,diff(elliptic_kc(x),x)],[x,0.1,0.9]); the two curves are : a discrete derivative of elliptic_kc and the exact derivative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 2005-03-18 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28849 Fixed. Thanks. This can also be seen by differentiating elliptic_f(phi,m) wrt m and substituting %pi/2 for phi. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165488&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-18 17:33:19
|
Bugs item #1165530, was opened at 2005-03-17 15:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rtoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165530&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: elliptic_kc and diff Initial Comment: The dérivative of elliptic_kc gives 2 times the exact value. To remedy 1. make a lisp file that contains (defprop %elliptic_kc ((m) ;; diff wrt m ((mtimes) ((rat) 1 2) ((mplus) ((%elliptic_ec) m) ((mtimes) -1 ((%elliptic_kc) m) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)))) ((mexpt) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)) -1) ((mexpt) m -1))) grad) (the same function as in .../maxima/5.9.1/src/ellipt.lisp modified by the "((rat) 1 2)" ) 2. load this file at the beginnig of a session. That's all. To see the error plot2d([(elliptic_kc(x+0.001)-elliptic_kc(x))/0.001,diff(elliptic_kc(x),x)],[x,0.1,0.9]); the two curves are : a discrete derivative of elliptic_kc and the exact derivative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raymond Toy (rtoy) Date: 2005-03-18 12:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28849 Duplicate of 1165488. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165530&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-17 20:11:26
|
Bugs item #1165530, was opened at 2005-03-17 12:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165530&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: elliptic_kc and diff Initial Comment: The dérivative of elliptic_kc gives 2 times the exact value. To remedy 1. make a lisp file that contains (defprop %elliptic_kc ((m) ;; diff wrt m ((mtimes) ((rat) 1 2) ((mplus) ((%elliptic_ec) m) ((mtimes) -1 ((%elliptic_kc) m) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)))) ((mexpt) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)) -1) ((mexpt) m -1))) grad) (the same function as in .../maxima/5.9.1/src/ellipt.lisp modified by the "((rat) 1 2)" ) 2. load this file at the beginnig of a session. That's all. To see the error plot2d([(elliptic_kc(x+0.001)-elliptic_kc(x))/0.001,diff(elliptic_kc(x),x)],[x,0.1,0.9]); the two curves are : a discrete derivative of elliptic_kc and the exact derivative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165530&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-17 18:52:56
|
Bugs item #1165488, was opened at 2005-03-17 10:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165488&group_id=4933 Category: Lisp Core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: elliptic_kc and diff Initial Comment: The dérivative of elliptic_kc gives 2 times the exact value. To remedy 1. make a lisp file that contains (defprop %elliptic_kc ((m) ;; diff wrt m ((mtimes) ((rat) 1 2) ((mplus) ((%elliptic_ec) m) ((mtimes) -1 ((%elliptic_kc) m) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)))) ((mexpt) ((mplus) 1 ((mtimes) -1 m)) -1) ((mexpt) m -1))) grad) (the same function as in .../maxima/5.9.1/src/ellipt.lisp modified by the "((rat) 1 2)" ) 2. load this file at the beginnig of a session. That's all. To see the error plot2d([(elliptic_kc(x+0.001)-elliptic_kc(x))/0.001,diff(elliptic_kc(x),x)],[x,0.1,0.9]); the two curves are : a discrete derivative of elliptic_kc and the exact derivative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1165488&group_id=4933 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-17 01:14:05
|
Bugs item #1086880, was opened at 2004-12-16 21:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1086880&group_id=4933 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: for maxima-5.9.1-1 Initial Comment: after rpm on RedHat9.0 #maxima #/usr/bin/maxima: unable to determine MAXIMA_PREFIX I don't know why it doesn't work. Give me a hand,THX!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2005-03-16 17:14 Message: Logged In: NO I have the same pb. with SuSE 8.1! Even after: export MAXIMA_PREFIX=/usr/share/maxima/5.9.1 and variations. Tricks welcome! kra...@fo... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Dodier (robert_dodier) Date: 2004-12-31 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=501686 To the author of the original bug report, if you're still watching -- I'd like to help but I think more info is needed. I have a very similar system (RH Fedora) and I can run Maxima as installed from the maxima-5.9.1-1 and maxima-exec-cmucl-5.9.1-1 rpm's (downloaded from Sourceforge). So it looks like your environment is different. Maybe you can give some more details to help us get started. -- Robert Dodier (rob...@us...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-12-17 20:32 Message: Logged In: NO [root@localhost root]# rpm -Uvh maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: tk is needed by maxima-xmaxima-5.9.1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1086880&group_id=4933 |