From: Andrew S. <str...@as...> - 2006-02-27 17:45:36
|
John Hunter wrote: >>>>>>"Andrew" == Andrew Straw <str...@as...> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> > > Andrew> Hi All, It looks like SourceForge has (finally) adopted > Andrew> site-wide subversion repositories: > Andrew> http://sourceforge.net/docs/E09/ > > Andrew> What do people feel about migrating from CVS to svn? > >I'm +20 on this. I've complained about sourceforge CVS for a long >time, mainly because of the lag which in the past could be days, but >also because of the lack of proper directory management. Every time >we wanted to reorganize the directories we would lose history. > >If you (or anyone else) want to have a go at migration, please do. It >should be pretty easy because we have a pretty simple CVS setup, no >branches etc. > > Great! I'm unable to do it myself (I lack admin rights), but hopefully someone else can follow the directions on that page. Or else someone can give me commit rights (astraw@sf) and I'll do it, probably tomorrow afternoon. Obviously, we should announce in advance when the changeover will happen. I propose the following structure, which we could implement as the first commits of the subversion repository once the CVS data is installed. matplotlib/ (top level) branches/ (empty for now) trunk/ setup.py lib/ (and so on) This will make life easier down the track when we want to make branches and will allow checkouts of just the trunk with: svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/matplotlib/trunk matplotlib I just downloaded inkscape from SF via svn, and all apparently went well. So, I'm optimistic on SF's subversion implementation. |