From: Jan R. <ja...@ry...> - 2005-12-07 10:14:06
|
>>>>> "Cyrus" == Cyrus Harmon <ch-...@bo...>: [...] Cyrus> I've also done a little bit of work to go back and forth to Cyrus> matlisp. I was rather disappointed that the state of matrix Cyrus> math packages on common-lisp was that I had to write my own. I Cyrus> would gladly abandon this project for an alternative, but I Cyrus> haven't found that yet. In the meantime, feedback on it is Cyrus> greatly appreciated. Well, from this interesting discussion it looks like there are at least several people interested in a matrix math package. Interested enough to write their own code, which means a lot. How about reviving Matlisp and making it a common base? While I like CLEM's functionality, I think using BLAS and LAPACK is pretty much a requirement, because of efficiency and a well-tested code base. So Matlisp it will be, at least for me. AJ Rossini's hints about his work on a statistics package sound very promising as well. But I'd much rather see things converge than end up with a number of incompatible math libraries. --J. |