From: <ma...@ll...> - 2003-10-15 19:30:27
|
> I think M+ and friends are fine because they're methods that take 2 > args. If matlisp:+ were used instead, it would break peoples' > expectation of being able to give multiple arguments. > > Adding such a macro to matlisp would be fine with me, but then we'd > get more complaints about this in addition to REAL. :-) I agree that M+ etc are fine. Although I frequently need a multiple-argument and multiple-type version. e.g., (+ MATLISP-REAL-MATRIX ARRAY-COMPLEX-2 SCALAR ARRAY-SINGLE-FLOAT-2) This might be a future enhancement for MATLISP. I currently define H+, H-, H*, H/ etc as Hadamard varients of each operation and keep adding methods as I need them for my work. mike |