From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2003-10-15 18:49:33
|
>>>>> "Marco" == Marco Antoniotti <ma...@cs...> writes: Marco> I'd go even further than that. I think that M+, M* etc etc have no Marco> business in being exported/defined the way they are. MATLISP:+, Marco> MATLISP:* etc etc are what you want. I think M+ and friends are fine because they're methods that take 2 args. If matlisp:+ were used instead, it would break peoples' expectation of being able to give multiple arguments. Adding such a macro to matlisp would be fine with me, but then we'd get more complaints about this in addition to REAL. :-) Ray |