From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2003-10-14 17:16:33
|
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <Nic...@iw...> writes: Nicolas> Users, hear! Nicolas> I vote for MREALPART. Ask again with a different message, so users (and developers) who weren't following this will see it. :-) Try both users and developers mailing lists. Nicolas> See http://www.femlisp.org. My wishful thinking is that it might become a Nicolas> better alternative to Femlab some day, at least for hard problems where Nicolas> Lisp shines. I guess I will announce it this year on c.l.l., but it has to Nicolas> be accelerated quite a bit before it can be recommended to ordinary Nicolas> numerical analysts. Neat pictures, but I don't understand FEM. >> I use Ilisp. May switch to SLIME. Nicolas> I searched for SLIME today, but didn't find it. Where is its home? You'll have to wait. It was accidentally deleted from sourcforge, but it is being revived. But it is also being registered on savannah.org, so I don't know where its real home will be. It sounds pretty nice, but only works for CMUCL/SBCL/OpenMCL. Tightly integrated with the underlying Lisp. Nicolas> I looked and GENERIC-FUNCTION-PRETTY-ARGLIST is used in my ILISP version. If it's still not working for you, you can ask me questions (but not preferably not here on this list). Nicolas> Somehow I do not understand this whole problem of putting together a stable Nicolas> CL enviroment in Emacs. Why is the interface defined by inferior-lisp, Nicolas> ILISP and ELI not kept up-to-date BY THE CL-IMPLEMENTATIONS which want to Nicolas> use them? Well, I do send reports and/or fixes to ilisp when something is broken, but I don't use the latest snapshots so I don't know what's happening there. Ray |