From: Brian J. M. <br...@in...> - 2003-05-17 18:01:27
|
On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 13:40, ma...@mi... wrote: > Nope. I had forward-ported the regular driver, but that was in the very > early 2.5 days before they changed the V4L API. :-( Did it change significantly where MJPEG capture is concerned? Even a partially working release that worked with tools like lavrec would suffice. > Porting driver_fb What is the status of driver_fb? What is it exactly? I understand it's a "stripped down" marvel driver, what what has been stripped out exactly? > sounds > like a good idea, but you'll have to wait for the fb driver to get > fixed, as IIRC it's broken right now. Is a working fb driver needed even for the MJPEG capture functionality?=20 =46rom what I have gathered on the DirectFB-devel list, DirectFB works on 2.5 with a patch (http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/linux/matroxfb-latest/mga-2.5.69.gz), and since I use DirectFB for my output (rather than MJPEG decode on the card) so as long as I could capture MJPEG with lavrec, I am happy. :-) b. --=20 Brian J. Murrell <br...@in...> |