RE: [Marsbar-users] extract fMRI data
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
matthewbrett
From: Chi-Hua C. <ch...@ca...> - 2004-05-26 14:47:23
|
Hi Thank you very much for your reply. Sorry I didn't mention clearly that whole analysis was processed under the SPM99, so I guess the problem of different orientation shouldn't be the case here. I used the old version of MarsBar again with the graphical user interface, and the result was still slightly different from that of the new version. However, if I choose 'No' for 'Filter data' option (which is not available in the new MarsBar), then I got the same results as those from the batch and GUI of the new version of MarsBar. What is your advice? Should I use the filter or not? What is the effect of filter on data? Also, the program uses SPM.mat to extract time course. I had already applied the high-pass filter to get each participants' SPM.mat when estimate the model in spm99. So do I need to apply filter again in MarsBar? If filtering is recommended, how to enable the filtering in the batch script? Thanks, Chi-Hua -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Brett [mailto:mat...@uc...] Sent: 25 May 2004 18:12 To: Chi-Hua Chen Cc: marsbar Subject: RE: [Marsbar-users] extract fMRI data On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 08:37, Chi-Hua Chen wrote: > Thank you very much for your reply. Now I can use the code you sent to me > before to extract data. However, I feel confused about the results, because > the mean values are a bit different from those I got from old version of > MarsBar. Can you tell me how is this possible? Which one I should trust?? That is very strange. One possibility is that you are using SPM2 now, when previously you were using SPM99, and the images have been automatically flipped in SPM2, as is the default, so you are looking at values from the opposite side of the brain. If not, maybe you could try extracting the data again with the old version of MarsBaR to confirm the two are different - as I would not expect that. Best, Matthew |