[Madwifi-devel] Re: Discussion: tracking only stable kernel versions or not?

[Alan S. <ala...@fi...>]

I second that vote. :-)
-alan

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:14:31 -0600, Thorsten von Eicken  
<tv...@vo...> wrote:

> My vote is simple: focus on getting a stable release out for stable  
> kernels :-)
> 	TvE
>
> Michael Renzmann wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>  Up to now the project virtually "ignored" unstable kernel versions.  
>> That
>> is, we didn't try to fix problems related to API changes, unless the
>> changes are visible in a stable kernel version. The reasoning behind
>> that is that tracking all changes that might occur in experimental or
>> development kernel releases costs a lot of time, and chances are that
>> APIs might continue to change until the release finally happens, or
>> changes are reverted for whatever reasons.
>>  Do you think we should stick to this? Or are there good reasons why it
>> might be a good idea to change that?
>>  Bye, Mike
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/