Re: [Madwifi-users] Fast rate, slow transfer?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
otaku
From: Matt F. <mat...@cl...> - 2004-09-03 10:02:12
|
Quoting Josh (Norm) Audette (no...@gn...): > Thanks for the excellent responses. Considering this new information,=20 > and now that I think a little bit more about how I was doing the=20 > transfer (thanks for the hints), the rate I was getting seems pretty good. >=20 > The transfer was done using rsync -av -e ssh. I don't know how much=20 > overhead the -v adds, but tunnelling through ssh would certainly add=20 > some. The wireless connection was also encrypted, which should add even= =20 > more overhead. >=20 > Maybe I'll give the same file transfer a try using my 802.11b PCMCIA=20 > card and see how well it performs under the same conditions. >=20 > Thanks again for the info. >=20 > Cheers, > Josh Hi again Josh, Using rsync over ssh will probably introduce a really high overhead to your test, since it both encrypts and compresses the data being transferred.=20 For a more representative figure, you should try using netcat, i.e. one the client end: # nc -l -p 3210 > output_file and on the server end # nc client_hostname 3210 < hugefile To give some idea of figures, transferring a 100Mb ISO between my pc and laptop give me ~13MB/s (I think my laptop's disk is the main bottleneck there).=20 Transferring the same file over my wireless card, which is about 1M away =66rom my AP, I get ~3.1Mb/s (just glancing at gkrellm). Have fun, matt --=20 Time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once,=20 space exists so that everything doesn't happen to you. Matt Foster | http://www.mattfoster.clara.co.uk=20 |