Re: [Madwifi-devel] Real throughput tests at 4.4km p2p link

[Punky <pun...@gm...>]

Hi Beat,

Did you use vmstat or others in your test to see if the WRAP boxes are
CPU bound (i.e. 0% CPU idle)?  I have experience that runing iperf
client and server would consume all your CPU power.  So in my
performance test, I don't run iperf on the measured boxed anymore.=20
Instead, I use wget to remote download a big file from another local
server.

local-server --- node A ~~~ node B

(node A to B is wireless link)

I measure node B performance by
   wget http://local-server/<some big file> -O /dev/null

The drawback is, node A would influence the result of the test.  WDS
bridge, routing, NAT, firewalling setup in node A would affect the
performance test result in node B.

- Punky

On 4/20/06, Beat Meier <Bea...@gm...> wrote:
> Wang wenjuan wrote:
>
> > Good, and How about your CPU's frequency?
> > Thanks
> >
> Both sited same: Wrap 2c cpu freq 266Mhz
> I have tested the same stuff in lab and it's the same.
> If the iperf client is on the ap site the througput is much better!
>
> Beat
>
> --
> GMX Produkte empfehlen und ganz einfach Geld verdienen!
> Satte Provisionen f=FCr GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job ea=
sier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronim=
o
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Madwifi-devel mailing list
> Mad...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/madwifi-devel
>


--
--
Regards,
Punky
P U N K N ! X  . c o m
Technology + Lifestyle
(http://www.punknix.com)

Voyage Linux
(http://www.voyage.hk/software/voyage.html)