Re: [luciddb-users] Matrix storage

[John V. S. <js...@gm...>]

Dan Hatfield wrote:
> I should note that the two aren't mutually exclusive. Some databases 
> have started providing an implementation of MapReduce.
> I don't think I've seen this for LucidDB however.

We've toyed with the idea of integrating Hadoop with UDR's; the fact 
that LucidDB is already Java-based should make that easy.  We'll 
probably do this as one aspect of scale-out.

For now, if you want this, you have to pay for Aster or Greenplum:

http://www.asterdata.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/11/more-npath-examples-web-analytics/

JVS