From: David B. <ap...@gm...> - 2010-03-31 02:02:01
|
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:58 PM, john <lis...@gm...> wrote: > Are SSD write times comparable with SAS? I wasn't aware of that. I'll > take a look. Check this article, which directly compares SSDs with SAS and SATA arrays: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2739/1 That article is a lot of pages, and if you look at all the SSD articles on anandtech you could be busy for days, but these quotes from the summary is it in a nutshell: "We frankly see no reason any more to buy SAS or FC drives for performance critical OLTP databases" "these fast SLC drives make the limits of the current generation of storage processors painfully clear." "Once random access comes into play, you need two to three times more SATA drives - and there are limits to how far you can improve performance by adding spindles" Basically, decent SSDs are faster than any spinning drive for sequential, and way, way faster for anything random, as seek times and latency are virtually eliminated. Terminal servers with lots of users can fall victim quickly to random reads and writes, the exact arena where SSDs really shine. db |