From: Vagrant C. <va...@fr...> - 2010-01-26 21:18:25
|
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:43:37PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > I then went through what I hope was a quite extensive round of testing, > covering boot/ldm/pulseaudio/ltspfs/localapps/group handling. That's > pretty much everything I suspected might fail and it worked perfectly ! > > So I tagged both ldm and ltsp, uploaded both in Ubuntu Lucid, backported > to Karmic in my PPA and pushed the changes to both trunk branches. good to hear! should follow shortly in debian. > Next up is LTSP 5.2 ! > Thinking of it, what would you think of having LTSP 5.2, LDM 2.1 and > ltspfs 0.6 released at the same time ? Would it make sense ? > I think it'd at least let us more easily see if someone's setup is > coherent as we'll know that somebody with LTSP >= 5.2 should also have > LDM >= 2.1 and ltspfs >= 0.6. Opinions ? while i see it as somewhat arbitrary to release ltsp 5.2 (though actually pushed for it at this time), i think i'd rather not change the versions on ldm and ltspfs unless there are significant code changes. if people really want to increment the others in sync, though, i'm not really opposed to it. scotty's working on some potentially very nice changes to ldm, though i guess that would likely become ldm 3.x. live well, vagrant |