From: Anthony M S. <a.s...@sb...> - 2007-02-28 02:57:01
|
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:45 -0600, Scott Balneaves wrote: > Anthony M Simonelli wrote: > > > My question is, where has the drop in speed at boot come from? Has > > anyone experienced anything similar? > > LTSP 4.2 was a highly customized boot process, specifically tailored to a > thin-client environment. Pared down rc scripts that executed things in the > most efficient order, didn't call external programs like awk or sed, but did > everything with shell tricks, etc. > > LTSP5's a different, and evolving beast. We're using the distro packages now, > which may or may not be as optimized as the 4.2 custom ones. Ubuntu has shown > a great lead in modifying some of their packages to work better in a > thin-client environment, and now Debian, Fedora and Gentoo are all working on > LTSP5 spec environments. > > Given time, the packages that get used in both thick and thin client > environments in distros will see some optimization, and boot times will drop. > > In the mean time, actual performance AFTER the boot are pretty much the same, > so that's a good thing. > > Scott > I have to agree that I do NOT see a drop in performance once the user is logged in; it is virtually the same. I figured that the packages from LTSP must be optimized in some way, and that's what I was trying to explain to my boss. I personally don't have a problem with a minute and a half boot because once I sign on I'm ready to go. Sure the Windows boxes at our workplace will boot in thirty seconds, but after you sign in and all of the start-up programs and anti-virus run, you have to wait another thirty seconds before you can do anything! |