From: Robert W. <ro...@us...> - 2004-01-26 23:04:49
|
Andi Kleen <ak...@su...> wrote on 01/26/2004 04:45:52 PM: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:29:48 -0600 > Robert Williamson <ro...@us...> wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot!!! This test was also hanging for us, intermittently and it > > was driving me crazy!! Applied this to our CVS tree. > > > You'll just get a random FAIL then. How about just disabling the test case 2 > in this test which is just broken like I described ? > > -Andi hmmmm....I changed the TFAIL to TWARN, so if the condition does occur, it will not log as a FAIL. This way the test can stay in, but will only record a FAIL if EFAULT is somehow not returned. -Robbie Robert V. Williamson <ro...@us...> Linux Test Project IBM Linux Technology Center Web: http://www.linuxtestproject.org IRC: #ltp on freenode.irc.net ==================== "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein |