Re: [LTP] [[RFC PATCH]] lib/tst_res.c: make tst_brkm() output more informative message

[<ch...@su...>]

Hi!
> OK, I'll add the informative message for tst_brkm() and tst_resm(), but not for
> tst_resm(TPASS), because most of test cases will succeed and will output too many
> redundant messages, users maybe unhappy...

OK

> >>From a technical point, maybe I would just use tst_brkm_ instead of
> > tst_brkm_d, otherwise it looks correct.
> 
> what about _tst_brkm() and _tst_resm()?

Names that start with underscore are reserved for libc implementation so
I would rather go for the names with underscore at the end.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
ch...@su...