Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sctp: Avoid using file descriptor 0 to get ENOTSOCK

[Jan S. <jst...@re...>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Xu" <xu....@or...>
> To: ltp...@li...
> Sent: Monday, 10 February, 2014 3:19:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sctp: Avoid using file descriptor 0 to	get	ENOTSOCK
> 
> Any extra steps needed before applying it in LTP?

Pushed, thank you,
Jan

> 
> Thanks
> Simon
> 
> On 2014/2/4 21:29, ch...@su... wrote:
> > Hi!
> >> Given that this is identical to c43ead6daa0b9ae5763d6cf3d21357a789651417
> >> from
> >> https://github.com/borkmann/lksctp-tools :
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jst...@re...>
> > I would be tempted to put the repeated code fragemnts into single place
> > (header included by all of the testcases). But given that the patch is
> > in upstream I'm OK with applying it in LTP as well.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
> Read the Whitepaper.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>