From: Markos C. <Mar...@im...> - 2012-01-04 14:13:52
|
On 01/04/2012 02:20 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! >> On 01/03/2012 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 01/03/2012 09:50 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Markos Chandras >>>> <Mar...@im...> wrote: >>>>> Hi, please review the attached patch >>>> >>>> Converting the function to tst_brkm and removing the tst_exit call >>>> below it would be better. >>>> Thanks! >>>> -Garrett >>> Agreed, but to make this consistent, all the tst_resm&& tst_exit pairs >>> should be replaced with tst_brkm. I will prepare a patch >>> >> Here is a patch that converts all tst_resm&& tst_exit calls to >> tst_brkm. Please review it. > > Commited, thanks. > > And please add better patch description next time. > Thanks. I will next time. However, I think there is a problem with the patch now that I had some time to look at in again. The last chunk is wrong. This statement + tst_brkm(TBROK, "Could not change to %s for child", child_dir); should be + tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "Could not change to %s for child", child_dir); Could you please commit this fix as well? -- markos |