Re: [LTP] [PATCH] hugetlb: modify hugeshmdt01 test param

[Wanlong G. <gao...@cn...>]

On 11/15/2011 10:50 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote:

> 
> This question has been raised for quite a long time: whether it is
> enough to run 5 iterations in hugeshmdt01 test, and no one answered it
> yet. For my past several months' running with -i5 option, results seems
> good so I submit this patch with the change in parameter. I believe -I5
> is a typo, it will produce ~hundreds MBs of logs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caspar Zhang <ca...@ca...>

Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao <gao...@cn...>

> ---
>  runtest/hugetlb |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list