From: Garrett C. <yan...@gm...> - 2010-08-25 02:41:17
|
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Li Zefan <li...@cn...> wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: >> Thanks. I need to test this on a suitable kernel. But doubtful if i can >> add in the default run. >> > > Why? Because it costs 90 secs? This is configurable, and some other > test suites like cpuctl cost more time. > > If a test suite is not run by default, I guess people won't know its > existence, probably. I think that more of the concern stems from the fact that it's a performance test, and a lot of people complain if and when their test machines slow down to a halt (take hackbench, proc01, for example). There are issues with the code, but it's dealing with the fact that it's not really written in a portable way. Give me a bit of time and I'll comment on what needs to be changed. Thanks, -Garrett |