Re: [LTP] add_key01 & add_key02 test cases fails and shown as PASS in log file

[Garrett C. <yan...@gm...>]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:29 AM, srikanth
krishnakar<skr...@gm...> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Subrata Modak <su...@li...>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 20:56 +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>> > I see these two test cases are failing on PowerPC target (ppc440) as
>> > shown in output file, but they are listed as PASS in log file of the
>> > LTP :
>> >
>> > Target : PowerPC (ppc440)
>> > Kernel: Linux-2.6.29
>> > LTP Version : ltp-full-20090731
>> >
>> > LTP output file :
>> > #############
>> >
>> >
>> > 1. add_key01
>> > --------------------
>> >
>> > <<<test_start>>>
>> > tag=add_key01 stime=1248549741
>> > cmdline="add_key01"
>> > contacts=""
>> > analysis=exit
>> > <<<test_output>>>
>> > add_key01    1  TFAIL  :  add_key01 failed - errno = 38 : Function not
>> > implemented
>> > <<<execution_status>>>
>> > initiation_status="ok"
>> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
>> > cutime=0 cstime=0
>> > <<<test_end>>>
>> >
>> > 2. add_key02
>> > ----------------------
>> >
>> > <<<test_start>>>
>> > tag=add_key02 stime=1248549741
>> > cmdline="add_key02"
>> > contacts=""
>> > analysis=exit
>> > <<<test_output>>>
>> > add_key02    0  TINFO  :  call add_key() with wrong args got
>> > UNEXPECTED errno:38
>> > add_key02    1  TFAIL  :  add_key02 failed - errno = 38 : Function not
>> > implemented
>> > <<<execution_status>>>
>> > initiation_status="ok"
>> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
>> > cutime=0 cstime=1
>> > <<<test_end>>>
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > BUT the Log file shows as PASS to the above test cases :
>> >
>> > ###########################
>> >
>> > add_key01                      PASS       0
>> > add_key02                      PASS       0
>> >
>> > ###########################
>> >
>> >
>> > May anyone explain, why it is so ? Is it a known behaviour ?
>>
>> No. It is not. On my X_32, it passes fine.
>
> Is it PowePC target on which you have tested ?
>>
>>
>> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key01
>> add_key01    1  TPASS  :  add_key call succeeded
>> $ echo $?
>> 0
>> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key02
>> add_key02    0  TINFO  :  call add_key() with wrong args got EXPECTED
>> errno:22
>> add_key02    1  TPASS  :  add_key call succeeded
>> $ echo $?
>> 0
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:12 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
>> GNU/Linux

Hi Srikanth,
    I think that the error is fairly intuitive (function not
implemented). Are you sure that your subarchitecture supports
add_key(2)?
Hi Subrata,
    As far as the actual issue is concerned, I think that the problem
is that someone's exiting with exit(0) instead of tst_exit()...
Thanks,
-Garrett