Menu
▾
▴
Re: [LTP] [FIX PATCH] ltp-rt_sigprocmask
|
From: Nicolas J. <nj...@pa...> - 2009-06-17 21:42:37
|
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:50:12AM +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed following failures and fixed.
> 1. rt_sigprocmask01.c
> 2. rt_sigprocmask02.c
[...]
> diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c 2009-05-21
> 23:53:00.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask01.c 2009-06-17
> 23:06:24.000000000 +0530
> @@ -163,14 +163,14 @@
>
> /* call rt_sigaction() */
> act.sa_handler = sig_handler;
> - TEST(syscall(174, 33, &act, &oact, 8));
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_tkill, 33, &act, &oact, 8));
This one looks wrong ... Shouldn't it be __NR_rt_sigaction ?
> if(TEST_RETURN != 0){
> tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to rt_sigaction() Failed, errno=%d :
> %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> cleanup();
> tst_exit();
> }
> /* call rt_sigprocmask() to block signal#33 */
> - TEST(syscall(175, SIG_BLOCK, &set, &oset, 8));
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigprocmask, SIG_BLOCK,
> &set, &oset, 8));
> if(TEST_RETURN == -1){
> tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to rt_sigprocmask()**** Failed, errno=%d :
> %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> cleanup();
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
> }
> else {
> /* call rt_sigpending() */
> - TEST(syscall(176, &oset, 8));
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigpending, &oset, 8));
> if(TEST_RETURN == -1){
> tst_resm(TFAIL,"call rt_sigpending() failed, errno=%d :
> %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> cleanup();
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
> tst_exit();
> }
> /* call rt_sigprocmask() to unblock signal#33 */
> - TEST(syscall(175, SIG_UNBLOCK, &set, &oset, 8));
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigprocmask, SIG_UNBLOCK, &set, &oset, 8));
> if(TEST_RETURN == -1){
> tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to rt_sigprocmask() Failed, errno=%d :
> %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> cleanup();
> diff -Naurb a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask02.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask02.c
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask02.c 2009-05-21
> 23:54:15.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigprocmask/rt_sigprocmask02.c 2009-06-17
> 23:30:42.000000000 +0530
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
>
> for(i=0; i<test_count; i++)
> {
> - TEST(syscall(175, SIG_BLOCK, &s, test_cases[i].ss, test_cases[i].sssize));
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_rt_sigprocmask, SIG_BLOCK, &s,
> test_cases[i].ss, test_cases[i].sssize));
> if(TEST_RETURN == 0){
> tst_resm(TFAIL,"Call to rt_sigprocmask()succeeded,but should
> failed, errno=%d : %s",TEST_ERRNO, strerror(TEST_ERRNO));
> fail++;
--
Nicolas Joly
Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.
|