From: Subrata M. <tos...@gm...> - 2009-03-09 10:14:56
|
Hi, On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:59 PM, CAI Qian <ca...@cc...> wrote: > Hi, > > This patch temporarily disables broken test cases, > > nanosleep01 > nanosleep02 > pselect01 > pselect01_64 > > because the ways to calculate the syscall execution time looks like > invalid. For example, in pselect01 test case, > > start = time(&t); > retval = pselect(0, &readfds, NULL, NULL, (struct timespec *)&tv,NULL); > end = time(&t); > > /* Changed total_sec compare to an at least vs an exact compare */ > > if(((end - start) >= total_sec) && ((end - start) <= total_sec + 1)) > tst_resm(TPASS,"Sleep time was correct"); > else > tst_resm(TFAIL,"Sleep time was incorrect:%d != %d",total_sec,(end - > start)); > } > > The CPU scheduler can suspend the execution of the program just after > time(), but before pselect(). As the result, (end - start) is not the > actual syscall execution time, which introduces a false test failure > here. The same problem exists in nanosleep01 and nanosleep02 as well, > > /* Note down the current time */ > gettimeofday(&otime, 0); > /* > * Call nanosleep() to suspend child process > * for specified time. > */ > TEST(nanosleep(&timereq, NULL)); > > /* time after child resumes execution */ > gettimeofday(&ntime, 0); > > > Signed-off-by: CAI Qian <ca...@cc...> I am not sure whether it would be correct to disable tests when they are broken (supposed to be). The inherent reason being that once a/some test/tests are disabled, they just go out of the perview of the testers memory, as, he/she can no more see the test results of the same tests. Already overburdened to handle/analyze so many tests results, he simply forgets that such-and-such tests - disabled some time ago due to broken issue(s) - needs to be fixed. So, i would prefer to keep them, so that it occasionally pricks into somebody(s) eye(s), and he/she is generous enough to give a fix someday in future. Regards-- Subrata > > --- runtest/syscalls.orig 2009-03-09 00:04:17.000000000 +0800 > +++ runtest/syscalls 2009-03-09 00:15:49.000000000 +0800 > @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ > munmap02 munmap02 > munmap03 munmap03 > > -nanosleep01 nanosleep01 > -nanosleep02 nanosleep02 > +# The following test cases are broken by design with the syscall time > +# calculations. > +#nanosleep01 nanosleep01 > +#nanosleep02 nanosleep02 > nanosleep03 nanosleep03 > nanosleep04 nanosleep04 > > @@ -699,8 +701,10 @@ > > profil01 profil01 > > -pselect01 pselect01 > -pselect01_64 pselect01_64 > +# The following test cases are broken by design with the syscall time > +# calculations. > +#pselect01 pselect01 > +#pselect01_64 pselect01_64 > > ptrace01 ptrace01 > ptrace02 ptrace02 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, > CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: > SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > -- Regards & Thanks-- Subrata |