Re: [LTP] tcore.c fails to build on ppc64

[Mike F. <va...@ge...>]

On Wednesday 14 January 2009 04:09:16 Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > yes, there has been too much "put all CPPFLAGS into CFLAGS and dont use
> > CPPFLAGS" in the tree.  it isnt a critical issue, but one we should be
> > fixing as we go rather than introducing more of the same.
> >
> > as for LOADLIBES vs LDLIBS, i believe the difference is that LOADLIBES
> > are local libraries (i.e. static archives from the package -- liblta.a)
> > while LDLIBS are external libraries (i.e. things like -lrt or -lcap or
> > ...).  but that might be more my opinion than reality :).  i'm happy as
> > long as one of those variables is being used instead of LDFLAGS.
>
> Could you write down these conversions used in LTP to toplevel Makefile or
> somewhere? I was confused CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS.

do you mean "conventions" rather than "conversions" ?
-mike