From: naresh k. <nar...@gm...> - 2009-01-13 13:47:52
|
Thanks for reply Yamato, I will investigate those issues and modify those test cases to support all architectures. I'll come back to you shortly. Thanks & regard Naresh Kamboju On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Masatake YAMATO <ya...@re...> wrote: > > Thanks Xugang-san. Naresh/Yamato, you can proceed with your porting, as > > issues seems to be resolved now. > > Naresh-san, sorry making you wait on. > Now we can go ahead. > > I've read your original message. > However, I don't know why it is failed. > but, I think we can inspect the reason after porting it > to LTP. I don't want to the original test case of crackerjack > because is uses the raw number of system calls. It may assume > i386. However, my primary PC is x86_64. I cannot run the test > case directly on my PC. > > One more. Could you report the kernel version (and distro) > you are using. > > Currently we don't have any proof it is *NOT* kernel bug. > > > Masatake YAMATO > |