Re: [LTP] fs_perms tests

[Mike F. <va...@ge...>]

On Sunday 20 April 2008, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 10:40 -0700, Praveen Kandala wrote:
> > When using fs_perms directly instead of the wrapper script
> > "simpletest.sh" following was the result, the test fails once in 6
> > times..
> >
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  PASS
> > [root@blade-cx fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  PASS
> > [root@blade-cx fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  FAIL
> > [root@blade-cx fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  PASS
> > [root@blade-cx fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  PASS
> > [root@blade-cx fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1
> > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500)  PASS

are you still having problems ?  if so, it'd be useful to have strace's to 
compare the failing case against the passing case.
-mike