From: Mike F. <va...@ge...> - 2008-03-09 08:28:56
|
On Sunday 09 March 2008, Robert Schwebel wrote: > If one of the variables expands to nothing, the test(1) calls see the > wrong syntax. It is good shell praxis to either use > > [ "$FOO" = "bar" ] for random variables, yes. for builtins that expand to numbers, no. > [ x$FOO = xbar ] which breaks if FOO contains whitespace. > here; this patch changes the file to use the first variant. i dont see any point since all the variables in question are numeric in nature -mike |