From: Subrata M. <sub...@in...> - 2008-01-07 11:45:01
|
Hi, Munipradeep has investigated and found the following gaps between the existing LTP test cases and the recent kernel functionality for the following Network APIs. May be somebody can help in plug-in those gaps in the present test cases. You can write new test cases in the similar lines to madvise03 as written by Pavan and Munipradeep last year end. I am also going to forward you another investigation outcome by Pavan. Regards & Thanks-- Subrata Modak, ==================================== Linux Technology Centre, India Software Labs, IBM India Pvt. Ltd., Gound Floor, Block D2, Manyata Embassy Business Park, Rachenahalli, Nagawara, Outer Ring Road, Bangalore - 560045, ==================================== ----- Forwarded by Subrata Modak1/India/IBM on 01/07/2008 05:03 PM ----- From: Munipradeep Beerakam/India/IBM To: Subrata Modak1/India/IBM@IBMIN Cc: Sudarshan Rao/India/IBM@IBMIN Date: 12/18/2007 12:24 PM Subject: Test Cases for Network APIs : LSB Vs LTP Hi Subrata, I have written LSB testcases for socket, recv and send APIs. I have compared those tests with the tests in LTP. The differences are below. 1. socket Covered in LTP: Tests for EAFNOSUPPORT Not covered in LTP: Tests for EPROTONOSUPPORT, EMFILE, Checking of AF_INET6 address family 2. recv Covered in LTP: Tests for EBADF, EINVAL, ENOTSOCK Not covered in LTP: Test for EAGAIN or EWOULDBLOCK, ENOTCONN, EOPNOTSUPP, Checking of MSG_PEEK, MSG_WAITALL, MSG_OOB flags 3. send Covered in LTP: Tests for EBADF, EPIPE, EMSGSIZE, ENOTSOCK Not covered in LTP: Tests for EDESTADDRREQ, ENOTCONN, EOPNOTSUPP, Checking of MSG_EOR, MSG_OOB flags Regards Munipradeep ------------------------------------------------------------ Linux Technology Center IBM India Software Labs D2, Manyata Embassy Business Park Bangalore - 560 045 ------------------------------------------------------------ |