From: Erich F. <ef...@es...> - 2002-12-16 16:31:01
|
On Sunday 15 December 2002 05:07, Andrew Morton wrote: > Sorry, the word from Linus is > > "This I just find too ugly. It's not "worthy" of a config option, and > unless there are other users I just don't see this being anything more > than a special "scheduler debugging patch", to be used by those who ca= re." :-( I find it ugly as a separately configurable thing. Otherwise it is just a normal monitoring feature which we had long time before starting to talk about NUMA. Eliminating this feature saves 16 bytes in the task-struct for 2 CPU boxes, GREAT!!! Anybody an idea what we could get in alternatively? Getting rid of the CONFIG_* just gets us back to the "original" and recording only usertime or user+systime halves the memory demand. But I feel like this is not the point any more... Regards, Erich |