[Lse-tech] Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

[Davide L. <da...@xm...>]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, John Gardiner Myers wrote:

> bert hubert wrote:
>
> >The interface is also lovely:
> >
> >
> The code you wrote has the standard epoll race condition.  If the file
> descriptor 's' becomes readable before the call to sys_epoll_ctl,
> sys_epoll_wait() will never return the socket.  The connection will hang
> and the file descriptor will effectively leak.
>
> As you have amply demonstrated, the current epoll API is error prone.
>  The API should be fixed to test the poll condition and, if necessary,
> drop an event upon insertion to the set.

So, please don't use :

	free((void *) rand());

free() is flawed !! Be warned !!



- Davide